Friday, July 6, 2012
Being Harassed by Debt Collectors?
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Evidence Preservation for Wrongful Credit Reporting and for Abusive Debt Collection Law Suits
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Credit Repair Answers | Credit Solutions
Monday, July 2, 2012
Training Your Collectors - Part 3
Sunday, July 1, 2012
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act GETLEGAL
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Protect Yourself from Deceitful Debt Collection Practices
Friday, June 29, 2012
EXPOSED! The ailing ancillary of debt collection
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Breaking the Law (Collectors)
Alabama Consumer Discusses His Experience With Being Sued By Debt Buyer LVNV
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Must advocate collectors chase the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)?
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Monday, June 25, 2012
Does the Fair Debt Collection Protection Act administer to Attorneys accession debts?
Sunday, June 24, 2012
FDCPA - Why Should I Use A Collection Log?
Saturday, June 23, 2012
About Allied Interstate, Inc. and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)
Friday, June 22, 2012
Debt Collection Abuse - Pete Barry - Green Room
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The Mirras System
Straight Talk about Debt Collection 2 of 3
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Thom Hartmann: Debt - Am I Going to Have to Kill You?
Monday, June 18, 2012
Part 2 Debt Collection Through Communication / コミュニケーションで債権回収
Sunday, June 17, 2012
FDCPA 808 Unfair Practices
Saturday, June 16, 2012
15 Things that Credit Collectors Cannot Do
Friday, June 15, 2012
Avoid Foreclosure - Stop Foreclosures
Thursday, June 14, 2012
four base tricks
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Stop Debt Collection Agency Harassment - ChisholmVentures.com
Pete Barry appears on Fox Morning Show with Mike & Julie 1/2
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Are Debt Collectors Harassing You?
Monday, June 11, 2012
What does the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act cover?
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Friday, June 8, 2012
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Debt Collectors: The 3 Time Limits For Collecting Debts
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Stop Debt Harassment - Fight Back
Robert Paisola on FDCPA Abuse from CNN
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
FDCPA How To Use IT To Get Out Of Credit Card Debt
Monday, June 4, 2012
Credit Harassment Must Stop
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Saturday, June 2, 2012
National Enterprise Systems (NES) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Friday, June 1, 2012
FDCPA Lawsuit - Before You Meet With Your Consumer Attorney
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Advanced Issues for Debt Collection Practice Webinar Series
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Using TCPA To Stop Car Companies From Harassing You On Your Cell Phone
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Great Educational Credit Tips By "Regina Littles
Monday, May 28, 2012
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and how it came to be
Sunday, May 27, 2012
Debt Collection and FDCPA - Pensacola Fairhope Mobile Panama City Milton Ft Walton Beach
Saturday, May 26, 2012
FDCPA Lawsuit Against LVNV, Collection Lawyers, and Equifax
Friday, May 25, 2012
Top 5 Violations of FDCPA
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Special Announcement for Your Legal Leg Up.
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
commercial accumulating agency,debt accumulating action flow,debt accumulating procedures,effective debt
How can you stop debt accumulating harassment?
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
What accomplishments does the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act accurately prohibit?
Monday, May 21, 2012
Debt Collection, Home Foreclosure, and Harassment by Debt Collectors Are Class Warfare- Fight Back!
Sunday, May 20, 2012
To Debt Collectors, with Love
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Friday, May 18, 2012
FDCPA - Why Collectors Being Forced To Pay Your Attorney Fees Helps To Settle Cases
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Does the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act administer to aboriginal creditors, or is it bound to third-p
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
What does the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prohibit?
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Pietrafesa Anthony J Esq
Monday, May 14, 2012
Michigan FDCPA Attorney Talks About Debt Collector Harassment and Practices
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Bill Bartmann | Entrepreneur | Debt Collection
Saturday, May 12, 2012
FTC Workshop Discusses Foti Compliance
Friday, May 11, 2012
Debt Collection -- Illegal Phone Calls To Your Work
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Testimonial for Transworld Systems Dental Collections
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
How Debt Collectors Are Using Social Media
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
n2credit.com
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Fair Debt accumulating Practices Act (FDCPA) - OVLG
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Informal 05/03/11 Meeting - Norfolk City Council
Friday, May 4, 2012
Debt Collector Voicemail Recording
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Debt Collection Lawsuit - How to Respond to A Debt Collection Lawsuit
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
FDCPA Mini - Miranda Warning (by Phone)
Monday, April 30, 2012
Performance Appraisal Interviewing
The Performance Appraisal Interview consists of the following three Stages:
1. Preparing for the Appraisal
2. Conducting the Appraisal
3. Following Up
Let's look at each of these in more detail:
STAGE 1: PREPARING FOR THE APPRAISAL
It is important that arrangements for the Performance Appraisal be made well in advance so that both Appraisor and Appraisee have adequate time to prepare properly.
A number of things need to be done in preparation to ensure a fruitful discussion:
1. Review Appraisees' Performance Appraisal Forms to refresh your memory regarding the Performance Measures (Goals/Objectives/KPIs/Competencies) that were agreed with them.
2. Review their previous Appraisal Summary & Performance Optimization Plans (POPs) to see what was agreed that they should work on improving. Did you do what you have undertaken?
3. Study their Performance Record Notes as accumulated throughout the performance period. Consult all other relevant records on their performance.
4. Inform them to prepare for the Appraisal by completing and printing out their Appraisal Prep Forms, and studying/printing out their Performance Record Notes. The system allows you to request that they release their Prep Form to you prior to the appraisal (check your company policy on this).
5. Agree a mutually suitable date and time for the interview. A minimum of one week's notice should be given. For more senior and specialist positions, allow even more preparation time.
6. Select a private, comfortable venue where you can meet in a relaxed, unhurried, informal atmosphere, without disturbances or interruptions. Avoid sitting behind a desk during the interview. Rather sit together with the Appraisee in front of your desk or, alternatively, at a conference table. Sitting behind a desk transmits a nonverbal message of formality, reinforcing the "superior-subordinate" relationship.
7. Set aside adequate time for the Appraisal Interview, which may vary in length from 45 to 90 minutes, depending on the complexity and seniority of the position under consideration.
STAGE 2: CONDUCTING THE APPRAISAL
The Performance Appraisal consists of two distinct parts:
(1) REVIEWING PERFORMANCE: A "backward" look at how well previously set Performance Measures and Standards were achieved, and the factors that affected their achievement.
(2) PLANNING PERFORMANCE: A "forward" look at new or adapted Performance Measures and Standards to be achieved during the next performance period.
The following FIVE STEPS need to be followed to ensure a constructive session:
1. Start with an icebreaker.
2. Explain the purpose of the interview.
3. Work through the Performance Measures (agree Actual Performance, Ratings and POPs).
4. Agree Performance Measures and Standards for the next performance period.
5. Close on a positive note.
The online Official Performance Appraisal Form need to be completed by the Appraisor during (or immediately after) the Appraisal Interview to record the actual performance information, including the ratings and POP notes, as was mutually agreed on by both Appraisor and Appraisee.
Let's now consider each step in more detail:
STEP 1: Start with an icebreaker
Start the discussion with a little small talk to ease the initial tension of the interview.
STEP 2: Explain the purpose of the interview
Explaining how you wish to conduct the Appraisal Interview will let Appraisees know what to expect, and will eliminate any unrealistic fears they may have.
Say something like: "Jane, I would just like to summarize the purpose of today's meeting again: It is to look at how you have been doing with the Performance Measures we have agreed on last time, and to see if there is anything I can help you with in the form of additional resources and training, or removing any obstacles that might hinder you in your work. Having done that, we will look at new or adapted Performance Measures for the next performance period of 'x' months. I will be making notes in respect of everything we discuss and decide. You can view everything I have entered onto the online system on your own PC afterwards. You should just let me know then if I have added anything incorrectly, so we can discuss and rectify it. Do you have any questions or concerns before we start?"
STEP 3: Work through the Performance Measures (agree Actual Performance, Ratings and POPs)
(a) AGREEING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
Take the Performance Measures - one at a time - and ask the Appraisee how s/he thinks s/he has done with them. Ask for and give facts and "evidence" pertaining to each (also consult the Appraisee's Performance Record Notes).
Your job is to act as FACILITATOR of the process. Always ask for the Appraisee's comments first. The key is to get them to self-appraise. Ask probing questions to get examples and supporting evidence of good performance. If you disagree, don't say so directly - ask questions so that Appraisees can come to more realistic conclusions themselves. Facilitation of this nature is particularly important with Performance Measures where subjectivity may come into play - therefore necessitating the opinion of the Appraisee even more.
Praise them where deserved (be genuine and sincere!), mentioning specific examples of achievement and behavior, e.g.:
"I am particularly pleased with the way you..."
"Your contribution here means that we ..."
When discussing Performance Measures that were not sufficiently met, it becomes even more important for Appraisees to self-appraise. It is so much more effective if they mention areas for improvement themselves. People can also sometimes be much harder on themselves than you would like to be.
Explore the factors that have affected their performance. Probe: "Why?", "What Happened?", "What would have helped", "How can we correct the situation / avoid it from happening again?"
Using 'we' as opposed to 'you' in trying to find solutions to problems indicates to Appraisees that they are not alone in this, and that your support is always available.
Be careful not to apportion blame. Discuss performance, not personality (what they do, not what they are). Focus on performance improvement and actions to prevent the recurrence of problems. There is nothing you or anyone else can do any more about the past. Rather use the lessons from the past to improve on the future. Concentrate on behavior that CAN be changed, and give praise where possible - even when discussing poor performance.
Avoid negative words such as "mistakes", "sloppy", "careless" and "shortcomings". The key is to keep your feedback constructive and nonjudgmental, maintaining the Appraisee's self-esteem throughout.
Admit openly if you have a shared responsibility for the Appraisee's under-performance, and undertake to set this right. Also admit if you are wrong in your interpretation of the facts.
If they blame you for something that went wrong, stay calm and avoid defending yourself - respond in a non-reactive way and don't get personal. Avoid arguments, by focusing on facts and supporting evidence. Always avoid comparisons with other people.
VERY IMPORTANT: You may never drop a bombshell (surprise) on the Appraisee by mentioning areas of under-performance for the first time during the Appraisal Interview. These, plus positive feedback, MUST be given to employees as soon as realistically possible after the event itself.
This, in effect, means that the Performance Appraisal only becomes a SUMMARY of what the Appraisee already knows, thus reducing most of the frequently reported stress that line managers have when conducting Appraisals.
Don't allow Appraisees avoiding areas of under-performance. Attempt to draw it from them with probing questions. If they persist in avoiding certain issues, give it to them straight, but sensitively, e.g. "Jane, let's now talk about the three customer letters of complaint we have received over this performance period. How do you feel about that?"
(b) RATING PERFORMANCE
After each Performance Measure had been discussed, and the agreed Actual Performance Notes recorded, the Appraisor and Appraisee need to give it a realistic performance rating. For this purpose, use the Rating Key descriptions and consider the Performance Standards and/or Behavioral Indicators listed on the Performance Appraisal Form for each Measure.
It is wise never to give your own preliminary ratings (even if the Appraisee asks for it). Rather ask the Appraisee what s/he thinks would be a fair rating based on actual performance as agreed and recorded. If s/he is unrealistically high, facilitate a more realistic rating by asking questions such as:
"Considering the three customer complaints you have received Jane, how do you justify a 4-rating that reads: 'Above Target/Standard?'"
"Considering the number of customer complaints you have received Jane, how do you justify a 3-rating that reads: 'On Target/Standard, including small deviations plus or minus'?. I cannot agree that three such rather serious complaints be regarded as small negative deviations. What do you think?"
Be prepared to adjust your thinking on a rating if the facts and arguments offered, justify this.
Care must be taken that the rating of performance does not deteriorate into a battle of wills. The secret is to stick to actual performance as proven by performance data/statistics, and recorded incidents/evidence (that were discussed with the employee at the time).
Of course, as line manager, you retain the prerogative to insist on a rating that you are happy with, as long as you can offer your reasons for it, whether the Appraisee accepts it or not.
Consider bringing in your line manager as arbitrator if you and the Appraisee cannot reach agreement on Actual Performance or Ratings. His/her decision will be final, although, in many organizations, an unhappy Appraisee may still resort to taking it further in some way, i.e. lodging a grievance (consult your organization's Human Resources policy in this regard).
However, by following the above-mentioned steps and principles carefully, major differences in opinion between Appraisor and Appraisee could be largely avoided. Both parties should also approach the appraisal process in a positive, constructive spirit so that Performance Management and Appraisals will effectively deliver on their intended purpose.
Remember: The primary aim of the Performance Appraisal is to identify stumbling blocks that prevent the Appraisee from performing optimally, and should therefore be an open discussion to achieve just that. The rating of performance is secondary and should not detract from the problem-solving purpose of the discussion.
(c) COMPLETING PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION PLANS (POPs)
Performance Measures and Standards that have not been met need to be put back on track. Engage in joint problem solving to do so, as each Performance Measure is discussed. The result of this discussion is recorded in the Performance Optimization Plan (POP) field of each Performance Measure on the Performance Appraisal Form.
Remember, employee training and coaching are seldom the only solutions for addressing unacceptable performance or work behavior. Poor performance or behavior can more often than not be ascribed to a combination of: a lack of resources and work tools; poor systems/policies/procedures; poor reward/recognition practices; insufficient performance feedback; other poor management practices, and a generally counterproductive working environment and organization culture.
Be open-minded to consider and address all of these. Frequently, these are for the Appraisor/Organization to address, and not the Appraisee. Along with employee training and development, the result will be continuous performance improvement, organization development, and proactive change management - leading to a "Learning Organization" in the true sense of the word.
Again, Appraisors should get suggestions from the Appraisee first before adding their own.
STEP 4: Agree Performance Measures and Standards for the next Performance Period
This is the "forward-looking" section of the interview as mentioned above. This part of the discussion can be handled right now as the "second half" of the interview, or as a separate session within the next week or two.
It is crucial that new or adapted Performance Measures and Standards be discussed and documented as close as possible to the start at the new performance period, so that the employee has the bulk of the time to deliver on them.
Also discuss any support you need to give Appraisees. Support is all about minimizing environmental barriers to performance, providing them with the necessary resources, training and coaching opportunities, and improving their motivation.
STEP 5: Close on a positive note
Make a positive closing statement, reiterating your appreciation of the Appraisee's efforts, ensuring them of your trust in their abilities and future performance, e.g.: "Jane, that concludes our discussion then. Thank you for the frank and constructive way in which you have approached it. I would just like to end off by thanking you once again for the effort you have put in over the last 'x' months, and also to ensure you of my full trust in your abilities to tackle your new objectives and targets competently. Please rest assured of my commitment to support you where I can, and do not hesitate to push on my button at any time."
STAGE 3: FOLLOWING UP
The Performance Agreement for the next performance period can be viewed as a negotiated contract. Appraisees are committing themselves to achieve certain objectives/targets in return for specified support from their line managers. It is crucial that you deliver on this promised support.
Provide all possible psychological support (praise, recognition, encouragement, etc.) and physical support (work tools, equipment, finances, staff, etc.).
Show interest by MBWA ("managing by walking around"), i.e. be there where the action is, observing their performance, enquiring about progress, and offering assistance.
Arrange the necessary training and coaching as identified.
Provide regular feedback on performance (both positive and negative/constructive) as soon as possible after the event.
Create a pleasant working environment and climate where people can fulfill their social and other motivational needs, while maintaining a business focus and urgency.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT OF APPRAISAL INTERVIEWS
A Firm Manner
Do not accept any ideas or suggestions from Appraisees that you are not fully satisfied with or that are not congruent with corporate and your own goals and standards. Tell them what these nonnegotiable parameters are that you cannot compromise on.
You do need a certain firmness of manner, which should be used as required during the Appraisal. It is your job to keep the interview on track and not allow serious digressions.
Firmness of manner means assertiveness, not aggression. It means ensuring you keep control of the interview -- always politely, but with authority.
Confidentiality
It is essential that you are discreet. The Appraisee must be able to trust you to keep whatever is discussed confidential.
Fair Assessment: External factors affecting performance
In assessing an Appraisee's performance, the extent to which circumstances beyond their control have influenced the achievement of their objectives, must be taken into consideration. This means that, if these circumstances have contributed greatly to good results, they should not get the benefit of it. Likewise, they should not be punished if adverse, uncontrollable causes have prevented them from achieving their objectives optimally.
The quality of an employee's performance also frequently depends on how good, reliable, and consistent the work output of others are, that input into their own work area.
Can the non-achievement of objectives also possibly be ascribed to the fact that other objectives took priority over it at some point?
Also ask yourself to what extent the performance environment (organization culture, policies, rules, systems, structure, infrastructure, resources, etc.) has prevented Appraisees from achieving their goals.
Appraisal Pitfalls
The following needs to be avoided during the performance rating process:
1. Tendency to give all employees more or less the same ratings, or giving an employee the same rating on all his/her Performance Measures (to avoid potential conflict).
2. Consistently being too strict or too lenient.
3. "Job Halo", by giving higher ratings to certain employees based upon your personal preferences, or one-off incidents instead of actual performance over the entire period. Managers should differentiate very clearly between those employees who achieve their objectives and those who do not, and give clear messages to both. "Compromising" and giving all employees the same bonus or increase will give the wrong message to everybody. Top performers will feel punished (even cheated) and poor performers will be rewarded.
Managers must have the courage of their conviction to give credit where credit is due and not be manipulated by those poor performers who rather bet on the manager's fear for confrontation. Such managers invariable end up losing the respect and loyalty of both types of performer.
The Performance Optimization Plan (POP)
Staff Training and Coaching (as per the traditional Personal Development Plan) are seldom the only solutions for addressing unacceptable performance or behavior. Poor performance or behavior can more often than not be ascribed to a combination of: a lack of resources and work tools, poor systems/policies/procedures, poor reward/recognition practices, insufficient performance feedback, other poor management practices, and a generally counterproductive working environment and organization culture.
Be open-minded to consider and address all of these. Frequently, these are for the manager/organization to address, and not employees. Along with staff training and development, the result will be continuous performance improvement, organization development, and proactive change management - leading to a "Learning Organization" in the true sense of the word.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Debt Collection Response
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Examples Of Illegal Third Party Contacts By Debt Collectors
Philippine Oil Deregulation - A Policy Research Analysis
I. INTRODUCTION
The Policy As An Output
Embodied in the Republic Act No. 8479, otherwise known as the "Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act of 1998," is the policy of the state that deregulates the oil industry to "foster a truly competitive market which can better achieve the social policy objectives of fair prices and adequate, continuous supply of environmentally-clean and high quality petroleum products" (Congress 1998).
With deregulation, government allows market competition. That means government does not interfere with the pricing, exportation, and importation of oil products, even the establishment of retail outlets, storage depots, ocean-receiving facilities, and refineries.
It has been a decade ago since lawmakers made a proposition that deregulation would secure the Philippines from the vulnerability of oil price shocks due to its heavily dependent on imported oil. But it is now increasingly apparent that many are calling to scrap the law as six out of ten Filipinos favor the repeal of RA 8479 (Somosierra 2008).
The Policy As A Process
When President Fidel Ramos started his administration in 1992, the country had already started feeling the effects of power supply deficiencies, with major areas already experiencing power interruptions. The power crisis caused a slowdown in the national economy for nearly three years and prodded the government to initiate major reforms in order to rehabilitate the energy sector (Viray 1998, p.461-90). In response to a power supply crisis, Ramos revived the plans to liberalize the oil industry that were cut short during the Aquino administration due to Gulf crisis.
The government's efforts to enact an oil deregulation law were also intensified in 1995 when the Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF ) started to threaten the fiscal stability of the economy. Deregulation was thus seen as the solution to the recurring deficit.
The problem of the OPSF deficit was in part related to the highly political nature of oil prices, which encouraged government to defer price increases as much as possible in order to avoid public protest even at the expense of incurring a fiscal deficit. However, government mismanagement of the fund also included using it for non-oil purposes such as financing other government projects or the public sector deficit when it was in surplus (Pilapil 1996, p.12).
At the height of a strong lobbying effort for deregulation by oil companies and despite the loud opposition of militant groups, the industry was eventually deregulated in 1996 with the enactment of RA 8180 (the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act of 1996) in Congress.
However, Supreme Court declared in 1997 the unconstitutionality of RA 8180. The Court decision stemmed from three provisions in the law that were deemed to inhibit free competition and therefore, violated the anti-trust mandate of the 1987 Constitution (Supreme Court 1997). But administration Congressmen quickly re-filed the oil deregulation bill leading to the new oil deregulation law. RA 8479 was then enacted to pave the way for the full deregulation of the oil industry. Since then, government has no longer control over the industry. What it can do is only monitoring.
Applicable Models
The policy model that best describes the policy process is Vig and Kraft 1984 model where policy stages/phases are characterized by five elements: 1) agenda setting, 2) policy formulation, 3) policy adoption, 4) policy implementation, and 5) policy monitoring.
On the other hand, the model that best describes the policy approach is Mixed Scanning because the Ramos administration resorted to rational planning process and incrementalized on liberalization plan of the Aquino government.
II. THE POLICY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLICY SYSTEM
The Policy Environment
Identified policy environment includes the regime characteristics of Ramos Administration, socio-economic structure in 1990's, and the prevailing international financial influence on the country's economy and politics.
The Policy Stakeholders
Identified as stakeholders in this policy are the Filipino people, the President, Legislators, Supreme Court, DOE, DOJ, DTI, NEDA, the oil companies, NGO/advocacy groups, and media.
The Interrelationships Between Policy Environment And Stakeholders
Despite a strong opposition coming directly from ordinary people, transport groups, and NGOs, the oil deregulation policy was still pushed through. It was formulated and instituted under the regime of President Ramos who, in his flagship program called the Philippines 2000, envisioned to make the country globally competitive by pursuing the thrusts of deregulation, market liberalization, and privatization. The media then exposed the fact that the biggest factor that influenced the formulation of the policy was the perceived eventual bankruptcy of the Oil Price Stabilization Fund, which had been originally established by President Ferdinand Marcos for the purpose of minimizing frequent price changes brought about by exchange adjustments and/or an increase in world market prices of crude oil and imported petroleum products.
Influenced by the International Monetary Fund, Ramos administration argued that there was a need to deregulate the industry because under a regulated environment, prices are not allowed to rise and fall with market levels. This means that when prices went up, government had to shell out money to subsidize the difference between the old and the new price.
According to the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA), had the government opted not to deregulate, OPSF obligation would have ballooned to at least P8.3 billion in 1998. The P8.3 billion is equivalent to the construction of more than 4,500 kilometers of provincial roads, 51,000 deep wells of potable water, 25,000 school houses, or free rice for 20% of the poorest Filipinos (Bernales 1998)
The Supreme Court in 1998 ruled in favor of the constitutionality of the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act of 1998. Since then, it has been the policy of the subsequent administrations to deregulate the industry. DOE, DTI, DENR, DOST are agencies mandated to serve as the monitoring-arm of the government.
Is The Policy Working?
The answer is obviously "No." IBON Foundation reported that the Oil Deregulation Law has further strengthened the monopoly of the big oil companies as automatic oil price hikes are allowed. Consequently, other oil companies took advantage of the policy, hiking pump prices of all petroleum products by around 535% since the Oil Deregulation Law was first implemented in April 1996 (Bicol Today 2007). The policy is also unable to solve or, at least, mitigate the effects of global oil crisis.
III. THINKING ALOUD
A. Repeating The Process
a.1 Problem Definition/Structuring
It has been recognized that the problem with oil is far from over as deregulation policy fails to meet its goal to foster a truly competitive market and reasonable oil prices. The current president herself, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, acknowledges the fact that the oil crisis is threatening to erode the very fiber of the Philippine society.
Unlike in 1998, the crisis today seems to be more irreparable as the United States is facing what many economists describe as the worst economic crisis in its history, triggering unstoppable skyrocketing of oil prices and prices of foodstuffs around the world. As already stated, the oil crisis is a global one and has to be addressed not only at the national level, but at the international level as well.
But why is the oil crisis a global crisis? Is it really beyond the government control?
The Philippines, like many other nations, buys the oil at the spot market. By "spot" is meant, that one buys the oil at a market only 24 to 48 hours before one takes physical (spot) delivery, as opposed to buying it 12 or more months in advance. In effect, the spot market inserted a financial middleman into the oil patch income stream.
Today, the oil price is largely set in the two futures markets: London-based International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) and the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). Here, traders or investors buy or sell certain commodities like oil at a certain date in the future, at a specified price. Basically, traders invest in the futures market by buying futures contracts called "paper oil" or simply paper claim against oil. The very purpose of buying oil is not to wait for the actual delivery of the physical oil in the future, but to sell the paper oil to another trader at a higher price. That's how investors engage in widespread speculation; and it is becoming a viscous cycle. Almost all countries, including the Philippines, buy the oil at the spot market where the price is already at its peak.
In a year 2000 study, Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) showed that for every 570 "paper barrels of oil"-that is futures contracts covering 570 barrels-traded each year, there was only one underlying physical barrel of oil. The 570 paper oil contracts pull the price of the underlying barrel of oil, manipulating the oil price. If the speculators bet long-that the price will rise-the mountain of bets pulls up the underlying price (Valdes 2005).
This only disproves the popular assumption that oil price hike has something to do with the "law of supply and demand." In fact, as much as 60% of today's crude oil price is pure speculation driven by large trader banks and hedge funds. It has nothing to do with the convenient myths of Peak Oil. It has to do with control of oil and its price (Engdahl 2008).
In its recent statement, IBON Foundation cited a study conducted by the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which revealed that 30 percent or more of the prevailing crude oil cost is driven only by speculation. IBON further cited that speculation adds about $35 to a barrel of crude oil (Martinez 2008).
a.2 Developing Alternative
In the face of the alarming oil price hike that threatens the survival of ordinary Filipino people, a number of stakeholders call for alternative solutions: 1) amendment of the Oil Deregulation Law, 2) scrap/repeal the law, 3) removal of 12% vat on oil, 4) seek alternative sources of energy, and 5) engage in country-to-country oil agreement.
a.3 Options Analysis
1. Amendment of the Deregulation Law
As the public continues to hurt from surging oil prices, many policy makers call to re-examine the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act of 1998. One of whom, is Ilocos Sur Rep. Eric Singson who has sought several amendments in the said law to ensure transparency in the pricing of oil products and encourage greater competition in the retail industry, which has been under the influence of giant oil companies. He cited the need to amend Sections 14 and 15 of RA 8479 to strengthen the powers of the Department of Energy (DOE) so it can effectively carry out its mandate to inform and protect the public from illicit practices in the oil industry and to provide more financial assistance for the establishment and operation of gasoline stations, which will encourage investment and fair competition (Malacanang 2005).
2. Scrap/Repeal the Oil Deregulation Law
To many, amending the law is not enough to rectify the skyrocketing prices of oil and oil-based products; they demand for the repeal, instead. A lawmaker from the Lower House, Cagayan de Oro City Rep. Rufus Rodriguez filed House Bill 4262 aiming to repeal Republic Act No. 8479, arguing that instead of fostering a competitive market, the law has only strengthened the oil cartel in the country and brought the oil prices up. The bill also seeks to re-establish the Oil Price Stabilization Fund. He articulated that dominant oil companies still dictate the price because even new oil industry players get their supply from the giants (Sisante 2008).
Militant groups and other non-government organizations have staged rallies and strikes all over the country in opposition of the deregulation policy. Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU), one of the country's prominent labor groups, contested that cartelization still exists amidst deregulation. In its recent statement, KMU articulated that with recent Dubai oil prices pegged at $97 per barrel (as of 3rd week of September), local price of diesel is at P49/liter; while when Dubai crude was at $97/liter on Nov. 6, 2007, diesel in the Philippines was sold only at P37.95/liter, or P11.05/liter lower than the present rates (GMANews.TV 2008).
3. Removal of 12% VAT on oil
Senator Mar Roxas said that government must heed calls to remove the 12% value-added tax (VAT) on oil and oil products as prices continue to go up despite the lowering of oil prices in the world market. Roxas had filed Senate Bill No. 1962. However, in her eighth State of the Nation Address (SONA), President Arroyo, stated that it will be the poor who will suffer the most from the removal of VAT on oil and electricity as this will mean the loss of P80 billion in programs being funded by her tax reform (Arroyo 2008).
4. Alternative sources of energy.
While many have engaged themselves in the long-running debate about amendment vs. repeal of the law, a number of stakeholders argue that Philippine government must, instead, focus on alternative sources of energy to rectify the heavy dependence on imported oil. Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri, now considered "Father of the Philippine Biofuels Bill," has hyped biofuel as the miracle product which can lower oil prices. But more and more scientists are worried that focusing on biofuels could jeopardize food production.
The Philippine LaRouche Society, an increasingly emerging think tank organization in the country, says that biofuel advocacy is a losing proposition as it competes with food production for human consumption. The organization calls, instead, for the revival of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) as soon as possible to provide the population with a cheap, reliable, and continuous source of power to subsequently free the people from dependence on oil. The organization further articulates that since that will require huge financial requirements, the Philippine government must, therefore, declare a moratorium on foreign debt payments-since much of which are onerous and merely product of "bankers arithmetic" (Billington 2005).
5. Country-to-country oil agreement
The Philippine LaRouche Society has long been proposing to the government to initiate immediate steps to establish bilateral contract agreements with oil-producing countries of not less than 12 months' government scheduled deliveries at reasonable, fixed prices. Government can also enter into commodity-swap agreements with oil-producing countries.
As a member of the United Nations and other intergovernmental associations like APEC and WTO, the Philippine government should join the growing worldwide call for a fair and honest oil trading by de-listing oil as a commodity traded in the futures market.
a.4 Deciding the Best and Most Feasible Option
It must be known to all the Filipino people that oil deregulation, as a policy, has failed to foster a truly competitive market towards fair prices and adequate, continuous supply of environmentally-clean and high quality petroleum products. Proposed solution # 2 (scrap/repeal the Oil Deregulation Law) is therefore a better option. But repealing the Deregulation Law is not the ultimate answer to the rise in oil prices. Even if the law is repealed, the Philippines will still be subjected to the same factors-a rise in oil prices in the global market.
Proposed solution # 5 (country-to-country oil agreement) can address the issue of the oil crisis at the international level. How about the efforts to solve the crisis at the national level?
The Philippine government must revive the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant to provide the population with a cheap, reliable, and continuous source of power to subsequently free the people from dependence on oil. As proposed, government must direct enough funds, instead for debt servicing, towards the revival and upgrade of BNPP. Removal of the entire E-VAT, not only on oil, must also be taken into consideration to ease the pain of the Filipino people. By moratorium, government doesn't have to extract a pound of flesh out of every Filipino to have the means to fund its programs.
B. Why seemingly "better" options are not adopted? The Peculiarities of the Philippine Policy System
From the standpoint of the present administration, amending RA 8479 seems to be difficult to adopt because re-regulating the oil industry would mean subsidizing oil prices-something like OPSF. To many, this does not work in an era of rising crude prices because it would entail government resources. This is where debt moratorium comes in as an effective fiscal strategy. But moratorium, to many skeptics, is unwise because they fear the blackmail or retaliation of the multinational creditors. Our leaders must learn how then President Nestor Kirchner of Argentina defied the predatory financial institutions, averring that "There's life after the IMF."
On the other hand, many leaders deem country-to-country oil agreement impossible to implement as the giant oil companies have still strong influence on the policy-making process in the country. On the part of the oil companies, it will be a huge loss if government will assert its power to have a bilateral agreement with any of the oil-producing country. Also, many leaders consider the Philippines as a small nation with no voice in the international assembly. But it is a matter of having "big balls," to put it in a figurative language. After all, they are the leaders and are mandated by the Constitution to protect and promote the general welfare.
Another peculiarity of the Philippine policy system is the negative perception towards nuclear energy. BNPP has been stigmatized as being environmentally dangerous and as being associated with "corruption." The fact of the matter is, the technology has already evolved and been modernized. The Philippine government spent $2.3 billion to build BNPP without generating a kilowatt of electricity. It is high time to revisit the old strategy to finally free the country from dependence on imported oil.
It is worth mentioning that the International Atomic Energy Agency inspected the power plant in Bataan early this year and reported that this could be rehabilitated, in full compliance with high international safety environment standards, in at least five years at a cost of $800 million (Burgonio 2008). The Philippine LaRouche Society emphasizes the importance of declaring debt moratorium as a fiscal strategy to start the rehabilitation. The organization argues that the Philippines is servicing the debt over US $10 billion per year, which is more than enough to start the full operation of BNPP (PLS 2008).
IV. INTEGRATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: TOWARDS A BETTER PUBLIC POLICY SYSTEM
With the recognition that oil crisis is a global oil crisis, affecting the lives of all inhabitants of our planet, it is incumbent, therefore, upon the leadership of the Philippines to immediately take the following steps:
A) To immediately repeal the oil deregulation law, for the government to assert its sovereign power to have control over the oil industry and economy as a whole.
B) To propose at any international summit or assembly that oil, being a commodity, critical to the continuation of human life, be de-listed as a commodity traded in the futures market, thereby escaping the clutches of unscrupulous people and speculative financial institutions.
C) To initiate immediate steps to establish bilateral contract agreements with petroleum-producing countries of not less than 12 months' government scheduled deliveries at reasonable, fixed prices.
D) To design a comprehensive energy development program, such as nuclear power plant being the most cost-efficient source of energy to date, for the purpose of freeing our country from complete dependence on imported energy sources. To this end, moratorium on foreign debt must be taken into account as a paramount fiscal strategy.
The crisis, which we now face as a nation, requires understanding of the problems through diligent study and concomitant courage to do what is right for the benefit of the present and future Filipino generations.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Occupy Wall Street Explained MERS Scandal & Fraud_1 of 3.mpg
Monday, April 23, 2012
(Part 4 of 5, 09.21.10, Foster City, CA) FAIR DEBT COLLECTION ACT with Robert Childs, FMA
Sunday, April 22, 2012
How to adhere up on Debt Collectors
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Free Criminal Background Check - Get Someone's Criminal History Free
Getting a free criminal background check is definitely something that is in high demand. With all of the current events pointing to relatives and close family friends as the culprit to some of the most violent and disgusting crimes, these types of reports are becoming common place in our society.
So, how do you get free police records?
In order to get someones criminal history check completely free of charge one must understand the technology that they currently have at their disposal. Where is the first place that most people go for information on line usually? Yup, you guessed it, Google. The same holds true for trying to lookup public records. You will be surprised to know that most newspapers and courthouses publish certain information online. This type of information normally includes arrest records and criminal history logs. For instance, if a news paper has a section of the paper that includes a police and fire section usually they will have a list of arrests for any given week.
It is because of this that you can often times dig up relevant information online by simply searching for their name, phone number, or address. It is wise to search for the various terms in a number of ways including, with quotation marks, without quotation marks, and different variations that you can come up to. One thing to keep in mind that due to the sheer power of a tool like Google you are often going to have many thousand or hundreds of thousands of results to sift through. Because of this, it is not always possible to rely on this method unless you have plenty of free time. This is especially true when you are seeking to do a criminal lookup on a person with a common name.
Is There another way to access public records?
Yes, there certainly are other options to get to the bottom of someones criminal past. when someone gets arrested or convicted of a felony or a lessor charge, this information is often considered to be a matter of public record. Because of this, you may be able to gain access to someones arrest record by getting access to the courthouses public database.
In order to do this though, you will first have to make an initial visit to the court in whatever jurisdiction the person lives in or has lived in for a majority of their life and fill out an application for information. Often times the different courts might have a website where you can apply electronically however, most of them require that you do it in person. After you have filled out the proper paperwork it usually takes anywhere from twenty four to seventy two hours for them to either approve or deny your request. If you are approved you will then have the opportunity to visit the courthouse and gain a limited amount of access to the public records database.
Keep in mind that the information that you are presented with is usually not organized or sorted in any particular way and it could take you several days to get the police records that you are looking for. It is also worth mentioning that if the person that you are investigating has lived in more than one city or state that these steps could possibly have to be repeated several times over in order to get the records that you are looking for. The people that have the most amount of success with this method are the people that have disposable time or time that is not already dedicated to other projects. While time consuming, if used correctly with a little bit of patience success is possible.
What if the above methods do not get me the background check I need?
If the above methods fail to get you the free criminal background check that you are looking for it is possible that you have to explore other options. By other options I am referring to sites that are available online for all of us to use that maintain a database of most of the countries population and the crimes they have convicted along with relevant convictions. One thing about these types of sites that is important to note is that the results are instant. From the time you enter the website you are in possession of a criminal history report in under a few minutes. It is this feature alone that makes these services so attractive and convenient to the do it yourself investigator. The report includes a detailed criminal background report on the target of your investigation that includes information such as arrests, convictions, address report, phone report, social security number verification, known associates, bankruptcy information, marriage records, divorce records, and other information that might be pertinent to your investigation.